CONDITION GUIDE · DC 8003 · 38 CFR PART 4

Brain tumor (benign) VA Rating

How VA rates Brain tumor (benign) under diagnostic code 8003, what evidence decides the percentage, and the reasons these claims get denied or under-rated.

Reviewed by Blake Leitch, VA-accredited claims agent #60720Last updated September 7, 2026

Brain tumor (benign) is rated under diagnostic code 8003. In the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities it appears as Brain, new growth of: benign, minimum, within the Neurological Conditions section of 38 CFR Part 4.

The essentials

Diagnostic code8003
Rating schedule nameBrain, new growth of: benign, minimum
Body systemNeurological Conditions
Examination formNEURO Central nervous system and neuromuscular diseases

Other names for this condition

VA and treating providers may use different terms for the same condition. If your records use any of these, they may still support a claim for Brain tumor (benign):

  • Benign neoplasms
  • cerebral aqueductal shunt
  • neuroma

What evidence decides the rating

For neurological conditions conditions, these are the findings VA weighs when assigning a percentage. If your examination did not address them, the examination may be inadequate for rating purposes — which is itself an argument on appeal.

  • Which specific nerve is involved and whether impairment is complete or incomplete paralysis
  • Whether symptoms are wholly sensory — that caps the rating at mild or moderate under the nerve codes
  • For migraines: frequency of prostrating attacks and whether they are productive of severe economic inadaptability (DC 8100)
  • For seizures: witnessed episode frequency over the preceding six and twelve months
  • For TBI: the facets table under DC 8045, scored individually

Why these claims get denied or under-rated

These are the failure patterns we see most often on brain tumor (benign) and related neurological conditions claims:

  • Radiculopathy rated as wholly sensory when the record documents weakness or reflex loss
  • Migraine denied as not prostrating because the veteran keeps working — the criterion is severe economic inadaptability, not unemployment
  • Headache frequency was recorded from memory at one appointment rather than from a headache diary
  • TBI residuals rated as a single evaluation instead of scoring each facet under DC 8045

If your claim was denied or under-rated

A denial is not the end of the claim. Which route is right depends on why VA decided the way it did:

  • Higher-Level Review — when the evidence already in the file supports a grant and VA got the decision wrong, or the examination was inadequate.
  • Supplemental Claim — when you have new and relevant evidence, such as a private nexus opinion.
  • Board Appeal — when you need a Veterans Law Judge to decide, or want a hearing.
  • Clear and Unmistakable Error — when a decision more than a year old contains an undebatable error, which can recover retroactive pay.

Effective dates matter as much as the percentage. See effective dates and back pay for how far back an award can reach.

Sources

Related conditions

We can file your appeal for you

You don't have to navigate the VA alone. As your accredited claims agent, we pick the right review lane, build the evidence, and argue your case — start to finish.

Appeal Your Decision

This page is educational information, not legal advice. VA rules and deadlines change — always confirm details with the official source (38 CFR, M21-1) or your accredited claims agent. Borne Accredited Claims is an accredited VA claims agent under 38 CFR §14.629 and is not part of, or endorsed by, the Department of Veterans Affairs. We do not guarantee any specific outcome.