Degenerative arthritis of the spine (neck) VA Rating
How VA rates Degenerative arthritis of the spine (neck) under diagnostic code 5242, what evidence decides the percentage, and the reasons these claims get denied or under-rated.
Degenerative arthritis of the spine (neck) is rated under diagnostic code 5242. In the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities it appears as Degenerative arthritis, degenerative disc disease, within the Musculoskeletal System section of 38 CFR Part 4.
The essentials
| Diagnostic code | 5242 |
|---|---|
| Rating schedule name | Degenerative arthritis, degenerative disc disease |
| Body system | Musculoskeletal System |
| Examination form | MUSC Neck (cervical spine) conditions |
How VA rates degenerative arthritis of the spine (neck)
Degenerative arthritis of the spine (neck) has no percentage criteria of its own. It is rated under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine, the same scale VA applies to every condition in that group — so the percentage turns entirely on how your symptoms measure against these levels, not on the diagnosis itself.
| Rating | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 100% | Unfavorable ankylosis of the entire spine |
| 50% | Unfavorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine |
| 40% | Unfavorable ankylosis of the entire cervical spine; or, forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine 30 degrees or less; or, favorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine |
| 30% | Forward flexion of the cervical spine 15 degrees or less; or, favorable ankylosis of the entire cervical spine |
| 20% | Forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees; or, forward flexion of the cervical spine greater than 15 degrees but not greater than 30 degrees; or, the combined range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine not greater than 120 degrees; or, the combined range of motion of the cervical spine not greater than 170 degrees; or, muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour such as scoliosis, reversed lordosis, or abnormal kyphosis |
| 10% | Forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 60 degrees but not greater than 85 degrees; or, forward flexion of the cervical spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 40 degrees; or, combined range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees; or, combined range of motion of the cervical spine greater than 170 degrees but not greater than 335 degrees; or, muscle spasm, guarding, or localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour; or, vertebral body fracture with loss of 50 percent or more of the height |
Criteria quoted from 38 CFR Part 4, Subpart B (eCFR edition 2026-01-01). Where a rating depends on measurements, the figures in your examination report are what decide it — which is why an examination that skipped a required measurement is worth challenging.
Other names for this condition
VA and treating providers may use different terms for the same condition. If your records use any of these, they may still support a claim for Degenerative arthritis of the spine (neck):
- Cervical arthritis
- neck arthritis
- cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD)
What evidence decides the rating
For musculoskeletal system conditions, these are the findings VA weighs when assigning a percentage. If your examination did not address them, the examination may be inadequate for rating purposes — which is itself an argument on appeal.
- Range-of-motion measurements in degrees, taken with a goniometer, for both the affected and the opposite joint
- Whether pain begins during motion — under §4.59 and Correia v. McDonald, testing must cover active, passive, weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing motion
- Flare-ups: how often, how long, and how much additional loss of motion they cause (DeLuca factors under §4.40 and §4.45)
- Objective imaging showing arthritis, disc disease, or hardware
- Whether the dominant or non-dominant side is affected (§4.69)
Why these claims get denied or under-rated
These are the failure patterns we see most often on degenerative arthritis of the spine (neck) and related musculoskeletal system claims:
- The examiner recorded range of motion without testing for pain on motion, or skipped weight-bearing testing — an inadequate exam under Correia, and a duty-to-assist error argument on Higher-Level Review
- Flare-ups were never asked about, so the rating reflects a good day rather than the disability picture over time
- Service treatment records show no complaint, and the claim was denied for no in-service event — even though continuity of symptoms and lay evidence can establish the link
- Pain alone was treated as non-compensable, despite Saunders v. Wilkie holding that pain causing functional impairment can itself be a disability
If your claim was denied or under-rated
A denial is not the end of the claim. Which route is right depends on why VA decided the way it did:
- Higher-Level Review — when the evidence already in the file supports a grant and VA got the decision wrong, or the examination was inadequate.
- Supplemental Claim — when you have new and relevant evidence, such as a private nexus opinion.
- Board Appeal — when you need a Veterans Law Judge to decide, or want a hearing.
- Clear and Unmistakable Error — when a decision more than a year old contains an undebatable error, which can recover retroactive pay.
Effective dates matter as much as the percentage. See effective dates and back pay for how far back an award can reach.
Sources
Related conditions
We can file your appeal for you
You don't have to navigate the VA alone. As your accredited claims agent, we pick the right review lane, build the evidence, and argue your case — start to finish.
Appeal Your DecisionKeep reading
This page is educational information, not legal advice. VA rules and deadlines change — always confirm details with the official source (38 CFR, M21-1) or your accredited claims agent. Borne Accredited Claims is an accredited VA claims agent under 38 CFR §14.629 and is not part of, or endorsed by, the Department of Veterans Affairs. We do not guarantee any specific outcome.
